The Smart Sanctions

Because of this, there ar errors with the carcass and restrictions on hold up for suspected individuals should not be authorize for more than two-year periods of time, subject to review by enforcement agencies and their agents. The "No-Fly" add up authorized by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is unitary travel restriction appointing suspected criminals, but the electronic Privacy Information Center has filed a lawsuit against the TSA, claiming "complaints from passengers who mat they had been mistakenly placed on the list," (Documents, 2003, p. 1).

Immigration authorities concord that such saucy sanctions and travel restrictions are necessary to ensure the high rate of illegal immigration,

but all too often cases are authenticated that show biased criteria for being so restricted or that show individuals have been left on the restricted list indefinitely for no good cause.

Lopez and Cortright (2000, p. 2) say that these kinds of tactics seldom work to prevent illegal immigration, primarily because, as they assert, "?sanctions are mostly symbolic in nature and have puny practical impact." That is, of course, unless one is the one being sanctioned and has one's travel restricted without good cause for long periods of time.

Tostensen, A. (2002, Apr). Are smart sanctions feasible? World Politics, 54(3), 373-403.

The U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) maintain that such travel restrictions on wanted persons are necessar
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.