Lolita- A Prepubescent Girl

For his role in this transformation, Humbert suffers greatly. He asks us to judge him lightly, since he could suffer no more than than he has already by the loss of his Lolita and her loss of innocence.

The bank clerk of the novel is Humbert Humbert. He asks us to be the judge and instrument panel in his case with respect to his relationship with Lolita. He maintains his coercion and desire for Lolita is both lust and art. Her just ripening intimate allure, of which she remains unaware, drives him to madness, "the little deadly demon among the wholesome children; she stands unrecognised by them and unconscious herself or her fantastic power" (Nabokov 98). At the same time, Humbert makes the case that he is responsible for Lolita's lost innocence. His unaccompanied remorse is that he has lost her and she has lost her innocence collectable to him, "hopelessly worn at seventeen" (Nabokov 277).

Humbert understands once Lolita rejects him that she could do nothing else. He understands that he is not only more than older than her and took advantage of her blossoming wind upuality and innocence only when his passion with her represents borderline incest. As he maintains, "even the or so miserable of family lives was better than the parody of incest, which, in the long run, was the scoop out I could offer the waif" (Na

The justification of Humbert regarding his relationship and desire to capture Lolita begins at the origination of the novel when he give tongue tos us of his lost love from his youth, Annabel Leigh. As Thomieres (165) argues, "Annabel Leigh was Humbert Humbert's innocent childhood love which he tried to experience with the help of Dolores Haze/Lolita. At least that is what the narrator seems to tell us." Whether we believe Humbert or not is a matter of whether or not we believe there is any justification for his efforts in trying to recapture his lost youth, one that can never be recaptured and one whose seeking motivates Humbert to become a pedophile. It is thorny to believe a man is innocent of any example transgression that is a pedophile, murderer, liar, and robs children of their innocence.

Humbert is talking to the jury. It's a mask hobo a mask, a screen behind a screen. Humbert the wheeler dealer is so thoroughly, speculatively, successfully manipulative that we are reminded how vigilant we fix to be not to be taken in (120).

Whereas Quilty is viewed by Humbert as merely selfishly satisfying his lustful desires with no regard for the welfare or injury inflicted on his nymphets, Humbert compares himself more to the hunter who is enchanted by the magical powers nymphets hold over him. If he views Quilt as a degenerate pedophile, he views himself as mortal who appreciates the beauty of prepubescent sexual sire and innocence, qualities he knows are temporal and cannot be captured for long, like someone who hunts butterflies but cannot keep one for long. In the loss and stir of Lolita, he maintains his suffering is punishment enough for any ill behavior others may view him having committed. Many critics have argued that the absolute novel is merely Humbert's case to convince us he is innocent of any moral transgression by having sex with a minor. As Kennedy argues,

Delaney, Bill. "Nabokov's Lolita." Explicator, 58(1), Fall 1999, pp. 36-39.

bokov 2
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.