The Ethics Theory by Kant

Kant saw this theory and himself as a profound catalyst for a revolution in philosophy, changing the flow into a totally new direction. In Critique of Pure Reason he argued that the principles governing sympathetic way must be a priori not posteriori, celluloid not analytic, rational not empirical, if ethics was to exist at all.

Kant came to this conclusion because godliness deal with the world as it ought to be and not the world as it is (Altman). Therefore, examples cannot be derived from experience, they must be independent of the world as it exists. They must be known a priori. Experience that shows us how things ar in the world at present, not how it was in the past, or how it pass on be in the future, or how it is meant to be, and morals should be constant, therefore they have to be a priori. This is what led Kant to his ecumenic law of compensateeousness and the good of the will. Following Kant's a priori paradigm, morals ar a consequence of rationality itself.

If the morals ar the consequence of rationality, and the will is the ultimate good, then rationality and the will are one and the same. The will comes from behaving rationally so that your behavior will become universal. According to Kant, the ultimate principle of morality must be a moral law conceived

Hume's theory of morality rejects the egoistic pragmatism developed by Hobbes and Mandeville (Fosl). Hume accepted the naturalistic, sentimental basis for morality developed by the egoists but undermined it by maintaining that the natural capacitor for sympathy extends homosexual concern, beyond the immediate self, in umteen cases concerns for one's own feelings merges with concerns for universal regard for some others.

Hume became very popular in England, America and in Europe, but was unpopular with the church, which he move to criticize even on his death bed.

Hume wrote that moral judgements are expressions of the passions that we feel (Lloyd). He believed there is no objective right or wrong, and that there are no external moral absolutes. Hume believed that the science of man was logically prior to any other science, and that all the sciences have a relationship, greater or lesser, to clement nature (Fosl). Hume tried to root philosophy in human experience in a way that both detect the limits of reason and eschewed metaphysical posits such as "spirit" and "God." He wished to produce a secular philosophy in the custom of Newton, Hutcheson and Butler. Rather than appeal to a divine basis for morality, Hume looked only to humanity's animal capacity for "sympathy" and universalizing "moral sentiment." It militates against Christian and rationalistic efforts to apply reason or revelation in the composition of moral norms.

so abstractly that it is capable of guiding us to the right action in application to every come-at-able set of circumstances, and if mora
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.