Who is Allende Paul E. Sigmund?

Sigmund describes the social context in Chile in 1960. About 35 sh atomic number 18 of the macrocosm belonged to the center(a) or upper social class, mostly livelihood in Santiago or Valparaiso. M each identified with the middle class, even if their incomes did not justify membership. People were chronically dissatisfied. The discipline literacy rate was 84 percent. The disparity of incomes among the wealthy and unretentive was very great. The annual per person income of the upper five percent of the population was estimated to be $2,300, and that of the lower 50 percent was somewhat $140. Racial differences were not a particular factor, although there was a noticeable darkening of the skin color as genius descended the socioeconomic scale, due to intermarrying with Indians (p. 21).

Chile in the early 1960's was uncomplete a closed society nor an egalitarian society still somewhere in between with considerable movement between the two. These internal shifts in an economically fragile country pose enormous strain on the system. In 1973, the nationalism, which tended to unify the country, broke down and social, economic, and political differences prevailed (p. 22).

The Frei establishment, which preceded Allende, had reduced inflation, redistributed income, change magnitude production, and grow education. The Christian Democrats were in power, yet there were certain endangerment signals which portended the catastrophes which would foll

Economic problems were reflected in plight readjustment difficulties, continued inflation, strikes, and imbalance between government income and expenditure. tempestuousness became so great that buildings were bombed and the military became involved. President Frei appointed a military man, General Tulio Marambio, as minister of defense. Violence increased in every sector, including the assassination of public officials. These militant Activities intensify the political polarization under the Allende regime (pp. 69-71).

Sigmund elaborates on the lessons that these events appropriate for lesser developed countries.

It is his belief that Chile experienced in accelerated fashion a transition from traditional to modern, from hierarchy to equality, and from elitism to democracy. In the Chilean case, ideological responses caused deep divisions in the country's authorities rather than mobilizing societal transformation. Sigmund blames this failure on Chile's economic limitations and implores that wealthier nations discover from this example.

Dr. Sigmund comments on psychological reasons for the intensity and duration of the violence in Chile. His comment is that "it seems that when men equipped with guns have others in their power, they are prone to act in cruel and inhuman ship canal unless restrained by strong legal and moral inhibitions . . . the psychology of those attracted to police work is often such that lacking any control they will give vent to their sadistic impulses" (p. 255). The military junta regime asserted that the coup forestalled a civil fight which would have involved the loss of a million lives.

ow. The government was in deficit in 1965 and 1966. Increases in salaries were raising prices and causation inflation. There was tension between Frei and the Senate, culminating in a hurt refusal of the Senate in granting the president permission
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.