New Sewer System

3 Several governmental questions were initially raised about the proposed project, not the least of which revolve about around the perceived unresponsive nature of the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors toward the citizens of Malibu.4

The debate, and creation outcry was certainly not new, and had been prominently in the word of honor since at least 1986. In fact, in an article chronicling the major(ip) stories of 1986, the semipolitical debate between the citizens of Malibu and the Los Angeles bureaucracy was noted to assume appeared several times.5 The circumstances became so explosive that the political side expanded into the California State Assembly. Because of the political debate, a invoice (SB389) was authored by Senator Gary Hart (DSanta Barbara) which attempted to stop Los Angeles County from building the cloaca system in Malibu prior to the time the residents voted on cityhood. afterward intense lobbying in August, 1988, the bill was defeated 3630.6

The political situation was further exacerbated because of the controversial positions of County Supervisor Deane Dana. Dana, a Republican, was raceway for his third term in office in 1988 and in that election year took an ineffective approach to the Malibu situation by commenting, "I'm taking a waitandsee stance."7 Although Dana believed that Malibu inevitable some form of new sewer, he als

Korn, Noel. "No relief in sight for jam PCH." The Malibu

28 Murray, "Sewer Panel...," 3; "Sewer Committee Flows.

"

10 "Letter From Director of Public whole kit and boodle Answers Questions About Sewers," The Malibu generation (28 November 1986): 1, 16.

As early as 1986, though, Director of Public Works for Los Angeles County T.A. Tidemanson noted that the proposed sewer was necessary because of an outdated unhealthfulemic system. He noted that the California legal system was unable to persuasiveness compliance by current septic tank owners, and that the annual increase in property tax assessments would be minimal.10 possibly because of the public outcry, perhaps because of the media attention, however, most of the cited septic violators decided to survey with city ordinances and significantly reduced the risk to the area from septic violations.11 In contrast, Questa Engineering, a California firm that specializes in septic tank systems, failed to inspect a significant portion of Malibu's tanks, in spite of a heavy contract with the county.12

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.